Skip to content

It can happen here

I live in Berlin, in a city that votes green and left and tells itself the story that this is what Germany looks like. Two weeks ago Germany voted for the European Parliament, and the AfD came second: 16%, ahead of the chancellor's party. Take the train an hour in any direction but west and you're in territory where they came first.

The map around the bubble turned, and inside the bubble the analysis wrote itself: a protest vote, a fever, a thing that peaks and breaks. France got the same treatment, with worse numbers. Le Pen's party took 31%, more than double Macron's list, and Macron dissolved parliament the same night. The French vote again in 9 days.

I've heard this analysis before, word for word, in Portuguese.

The movie I already watched

I'm Brazilian. In 2017 the idea of Bolsonaro as president was a joke you made at dinner, and everyone at the table laughed. In October 2018 he was president, and the laughing had stopped about 6 months too late for anyone to do anything with the seriousness.

The scene I remember isn't a rally. It's the family WhatsApp group. Sometime in 2018 it stopped being birthday photos and became a firehose of forwards: fabricated quotes, doctored images, voice messages from nobody, warning about communist plots in schools. People I love, people with degrees and good hearts, forwarded them by the dozen. Arguing with one forward took an hour and by then 6 more had arrived. It wasn't a debate we lost. It was a volume we drowned in, and later reporting showed much of it was industrial: bulk messaging, funded, targeted.

Now, here's the playbook as I lived it, and where Europe is on each line:

  1. The outsider posture from a career insider. Bolsonaro had been in Congress for 27 years and ran against "the system". The AfD is run by a former Goldman banker and a doctor of economics; RN is a family firm half a century old. All of them run as the outside.
  2. The firehose. Ours was WhatsApp. The European edition runs on TikTok, where the AfD out-produces and out-performs every other German party, and it aims at the young.
  3. The respectable handshake. Market liberals backed Bolsonaro assuming they could steer him. The European center-right is currently discovering reasons why some far-right votes might be workable.
  4. The polite phase. Before power, everything scandalous is a misunderstanding, taken out of context, the work of one bad candidate. Germany just tested this: the AfD's lead candidate said the SS were "not all criminals", another staffer was arrested spying for China, a secret meeting about deporting citizens was exposed and millions marched against it. That all happened before the vote. They came second anyway.

That last line is the one I'd underline for my neighbors here. The scandals landed, the outrage was enormous, and the vote went up. When outrage stops costing votes, the polite phase is ending.

The young didn't get the memo

The comforting story says the far right is old men aging out of the electorate. Germany let 16-year-olds vote in this election for the first time, and the AfD's share among under-25s roughly tripled since 2019. The kids who were supposed to be the firewall's future turned out to be the leading indicator.

However, I don't think they're voting for uniforms. They're voting from rents that eat half a salary, from pandemic schooling nobody fixed afterwards, from an algorithm that serves them grievance with better production values than any civics class, or simply against a center that talks to them like an HR department. Naming the material causes isn't excusing the vote. It's admitting the vote has fuel, and that the fuel is being refilled.

The strongest objection, conceded

The best argument against my alarm is Meloni. Italy did elect the post-fascist party, and a year and a half in, she governs more conventionally than she campaigned: pro-NATO, pro-Ukraine, negotiating in Brussels like anyone else. Power domesticates. It's a real pattern and I concede it fully.

But I've also seen the other branch of that experiment. Bolsonaro didn't moderate; he spent 4 years stress-testing every institution he touched, and when he lost, his supporters stormed the capital. Same playbook, different ending, and nobody knew which ending they'd bought until it arrived. Betting a constitution on "office will calm them down" is not risk management; it's hope with a suit on.

And even the calm ending moves the window. What was unsayable in Berlin in 2014 is a second-place platform in 2024. Moderation in office has never once moved that window back.

This got heavier than my usual chart-walking!

Check the clock

Brazil's clock ran 4 years: dinner-table joke in 2014, protest vote in 2016, unstoppable by 2018. Europe's clock is not at zero. The AfD is second nationally, 3 eastern German states vote in September, and France may have a far-right prime minister in 3 weeks. I'm not predicting that outcome; the point of a clock isn't the alarm, it's that it keeps moving while you feel safe.

"It can't happen here" is not an analysis. It's the sound the clock makes.